1. Should we transform our representative
democracies to direct democracies and make politicians obsolete?
Absolutely not. If I am
going to democracy directly in the country now, I think it will bring ruin. The
modern state is very professional and huge as I said above.
It is impossible to proceed with this system through direct democracy.
So it is only voting if there is something important in the country, and that form is the way it is.
Politicians are also professional or highly knowledgeable. It is true that they are intelligent, even if they are accused. Their role is to do politics, and it is a mistaken idea that no matter how much they believe, the ordinary citizen takes up all of their share.
It is impossible to proceed with this system through direct democracy.
So it is only voting if there is something important in the country, and that form is the way it is.
Politicians are also professional or highly knowledgeable. It is true that they are intelligent, even if they are accused. Their role is to do politics, and it is a mistaken idea that no matter how much they believe, the ordinary citizen takes up all of their share.
2. About half of the people in Korean and
American electorates does not bother to turn out for elections. Why do you
think this is the case?
I think this is the
democratic loophole. Very reasonable, but if people do not use their voting
rights, then an undesirable candidate can be elected.
Why are Koreans and
Americans poor turnout? The answer is simple.
They all know that
their vote is precious. Perhaps the United States would have hundreds of
millions of votes, and one would think that an individual would not influence
the election.
but I accusing them
of having a bourgeois and limited vision.
No comments:
Post a Comment